Timing belt - Nissan Versa Forums
General Technical & Electrical Anything not in a specific group, discuss here

User Tag List

 4Likes
  • 1 Post By arudlang
  • 1 Post By Cobb
  • 1 Post By amc49
  • 1 Post By amc49
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 10 Old 02-13-2017, 04:06 PM Thread Starter
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Timing belt

Hi, just bought a Versa with 42,000 miles on the odometer and wondered if there's a recommended time to replace the timing belt.
Barnum is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 Old 02-13-2017, 07:40 PM
Level IV Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Versa's have timing chains, my friend.

I am obligated to point out the handy search feature of the forum which can be used to find answers to many common questions like this which helps cut down on duplicate threads
arudlang is offline  
post #3 of 10 Old 02-14-2017, 02:33 PM Thread Starter
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Well thanks, I think....
Barnum is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 10 Old 03-24-2017, 08:47 PM
Level I Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I bought my 2016 Versa Note on short notice (I got up that morning and did not know I would be driving home a Nissan in the evening), so I had to discover a lot of things about the car afterwards. I was pleasantly surprised to find the engine did not have a rubber timing belt, which normally needs to be replaced before 100,000 miles. I am guessing Nissan did this on purpose? Good move.

2013 Ford Mustang GT Premium with Track Pack (11-14 MPG)
2016 Nissan Versa Note SV (36 MPG and climbing)
Clevor is offline  
post #5 of 10 Old 03-25-2017, 11:10 AM
Level VI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Behind the times.............ever since most timing belts went to Kevlar compounds belt replacement periods went from 60K miles to around 120K unless the engine is a high perf model..............many can go higher than that, people all the time get 200K out of some of them but that's pushing it.
amc49 is offline  
post #6 of 10 Old 03-27-2017, 02:36 PM
Level IV Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I would have no issue with a timing belt engine as long as its a non-interference motor. Unfortunately most modern engines are interference type. My old chevy (suzuki) sprint is non-interference so when that belt breaks put on a new one and back in business, but lots of people have wrecked their valves on other motors because people don't get the belt changed in time and then when it goes you have a huge shop bill to R/R.

I checked BEFORE I bought my versa, and believe you me if the versa used a timing belt and an interference design engine I would not have bought one based on that one strike alone.
Cobb likes this.
arudlang is offline  
post #7 of 10 Old 03-27-2017, 08:14 PM
Level VI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Central, VA
Posts: 1,105
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I dont know about that. My honda odyssey isnt high performance and they recommend changing it early if you use the vehicle in a cold climate. To make matters worse the water pump is located behind the timing belt. I believe the timing belt kit actually includes a water pump to replace. I bought my odyssey used and asked they do that before I purchased it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by amc49 View Post
Behind the times.............ever since most timing belts went to Kevlar compounds belt replacement periods went from 60K miles to around 120K unless the engine is a high perf model
arudlang likes this.
Cobb is offline  
post #8 of 10 Old 03-28-2017, 01:30 AM
Level VI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
And why they do it. It is borderline stupid to change a timing belt that has the water pump in its' belt run yet not change the pump at the same time................yet so many do just like the ones who promise over and over to change belts on the interference ones then don't. Kablooey and new car time.

I have met the enemy and he is me.

Look at all belt maker (not car) recommendations, averaged out most say 120K miles now unless the engine is a hi-perf one. Been that way since around '98-'00, when the better belts began to show up on cars off the showroom floor.

I had Ford 2.3 SOHCs and have 2.0 zetecs, both are non-interference and have 120K change intervals, both engines were 60K before '98. Any sooner than that and you have a manufacturer who is getting extra shop throughput based on your fears unless the car is a hotrod. The Ford zetec SVT model is one of those, it still changes at 60K because the engine bends every valve in it if it slips time because of the variable valve timing. Most will go the 120K but if raced like so many do you are asking for it. Variable valve timing alone often takes a non-interference engine and changes it to interference.

I too check on basic motor designs and problems with the specific motor/trans before I ever entertain purchasing a certain car. You wouldn't catch me dead with one of the newest Ford DCT Focus cars, they are utter pieces of garbage.
arudlang likes this.
amc49 is offline  
post #9 of 10 Old 03-29-2017, 02:21 AM
Level VI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Central, VA
Posts: 1,105
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Being a former mechanic I rather have chain than belt. Ive seen many belts with teeth missing, but never a chain failure. True as a chain stretches it eats up the sprockets and rounds off the teeth, but it also happens with the cog belt gears too.
Cobb is offline  
post #10 of 10 Old 03-31-2017, 05:52 AM
Level VI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I like chain too but now with all the ways they do it the guides and tensioners commonly end up being issues at higher mileages before the chain itself ever is. If the dust covers are kept over rubber belt gears they hardly ever wear but break a cover to let dirt in and the sprocket wear kicks up 500%. Chain wear is often very hard particles too and will wear engines like you would not believe, belts can't do that..........the usual tradeoff there.
Michael M likes this.
amc49 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome