ok so yeah im lazy dont feel like all the typing, and ive gotten lazy last month or so, but here is the data i compiled
I cannot understand how the gas suppliers control non-US car manufactures fuel economy?
I had an 89 Nissan P/U with the Z24 engine (factory w/8 plugs) and commonly calculated 35-40 MPG. Now, 20 years later with tech advancements, my 2009 Versa gets much less.
My current calculations average 29 MPG (driving like grandma) and 28 MPG (driving like speed racer). This is FAR from the window sticker of 31 (some get 36) as advertised.
I have less than 2000 on the clock and will keep better records for the future postings.
******EDIT**************
I travel 25 miles to and from work daily, at highway speed (55-75) with the same results. Maybe the engine needs more miles¿
I did a google conversion and got 12.19 (kilometers per liter) = 28.6726577 miles per gallon. That is not bad for the conditions you posted.So I have been trying to keep track, and just started recently.
So for example, on October 31, 2009 I put 39.78 Litres in the car, and the tank was 485 kms. So I take 485/39.78? That would give me 12.19 kms / litre. Is that how you do it?
If so, for the past four fillups (usually fill up once a week), I have averaged 12 kms/litre. Keep in mind, it's been very cold up here, so heat has been on all the time, and I have been doing about 80% city driving, and have the CVT transmission.
You have the CVT not the 4spd auto. The CVT's get really good gas mileage. Actually I think the newer CVT's 09+ get better mileage then manual transmissions.Okay. So I did it right? Sweet!
Sounds like I'm getting the same then as everyone else. Ya I have the auto so that's probably why I'm not getting as good as you. And because I work in the city now a lot I have less commuting done on the highway (which I prefer). Oh well! I think it's still good![]()
:lol: Sorry that's what I meant. I still call her an auto ... still one in my eyes, when there is no shifting involved I think it's an autoYou have the CVT not the 4spd auto.
He may have lost but while you were getting 24mpg he was getting 42beat a crx today with a fart can and i bet i still got 24+mpgs.. anyway my last fill up was $27.00 for 10.9xx gallons and i got 342.7 miles on that tank. 31.44 mpgs isnt bad for about 50/50 city and highway
Back in the day cars were so much lighter and got way better mpg. Crash standards and emissions really screwed us over in that sense. But I guess were safer and our kids will have cleaner air to breath.Yes it is, when 20 years ago japan cars (in the US) got better.
^lol true story. crx gas mileage is pretty great cause they are so little. i dont agree with emissions laws because there are many countries without them so our efforts are constantly being counter attacked. maybe im just bitter because my car should get better mpgs. bleh. :shrug:He may have lost but while you were getting 24mpg he was getting 42. CRX FTMFW! You must have been racing an HF or auto DX because I would think a manual DX and an SI would but a whoopin on a Versa. I could be wrong though.
Back in the day cars were so much lighter and got way better mpg. Crash standards and emissions really screwed us over in that sense. But I guess were safer and our kids will have cleaner air to breath.