I have been watching my A/F ratio while live data logging with a Foxwell NT710. This is a MR20DE engine of 2011 vintage and a CVT if that matters. What draws my attention is that it appears to run a few thousandths (.99X) to the rich side on a fairly regular basis. I know there are other numbers to watch, stft, ltft, sensor voltages, among others to watch for but which one or group means the most, or most accurate?
The question comes from the stoich numbers for regular gas, 14.7, to the fuel we are forced to purchase/run today. The regular octane 87 gas we purchase is not stoich at 14.7! With 10% Ethanol added to the fuel, the shoich calculation is closer to 14.1, or something close to that. I've seen various numbers for this calculation but they all agree that it's certainly not 14.7.
Ok, so if LAMBDA is a constant 1.000v, how is the ECU determining this with the available fuel today?
With that in mind, if our ECU's are programmed to shoot for 14.7, is this cause for the monitored results to end up slightly on the rich side? How does this affect various other components? Then there's those pesky little code thingies, etc.
The real deal here is, in my opinion, Nissan should offer a software update to modify the programming to account for the fuel difference. Free of charge would be nice but I would entertain a reasonable fee for the upgrade. Probably never happen but a nice thought.
What do you guys think about ALL this? Anyone else notice this indication in A/F?
Thanks for your attention,
Larry
The question comes from the stoich numbers for regular gas, 14.7, to the fuel we are forced to purchase/run today. The regular octane 87 gas we purchase is not stoich at 14.7! With 10% Ethanol added to the fuel, the shoich calculation is closer to 14.1, or something close to that. I've seen various numbers for this calculation but they all agree that it's certainly not 14.7.
Ok, so if LAMBDA is a constant 1.000v, how is the ECU determining this with the available fuel today?
With that in mind, if our ECU's are programmed to shoot for 14.7, is this cause for the monitored results to end up slightly on the rich side? How does this affect various other components? Then there's those pesky little code thingies, etc.
The real deal here is, in my opinion, Nissan should offer a software update to modify the programming to account for the fuel difference. Free of charge would be nice but I would entertain a reasonable fee for the upgrade. Probably never happen but a nice thought.
What do you guys think about ALL this? Anyone else notice this indication in A/F?
Thanks for your attention,
Larry